Characterizing Intersectional Group Fairness with Worst-Case Comparisons

  • 2021-01-18 17:53:13
  • Avijit Ghosh, Lea Genuit, Mary Reagan
  • 0

Abstract

Machine Learning or Artificial Intelligence algorithms have gainedconsiderable scrutiny in recent times owing to their propensity towardsimitating and amplifying existing prejudices in society. This has led to aniche but growing body of work that identifies and attempts to fix thesebiases. A first step towards making these algorithms more fair is designingmetrics that measure unfairness. Most existing work in this field deals witheither a binary view of fairness (protected vs. unprotected groups) orpolitically defined categories (race or gender). Such categorization misses theimportant nuance of intersectionality - biases can often be amplified insubgroups that combine membership from different categories, especially if sucha subgroup is particularly underrepresented in historical platforms ofopportunity. In this paper, we discuss why fairness metrics need to be looked at under thelens of intersectionality, identify existing work in intersectional fairness,suggest a simple worst case comparison method to expand the definitions ofexisting group fairness metrics to incorporate intersectionality, and finallyconclude with the social, legal and political framework to handleintersectional fairness in the modern context.

 

Quick Read (beta)

loading the full paper ...