Abstract
Rapid technological advancements in AI as well as the growing deployment ofintelligent technologies in new application domains are currently driving thecompetition between businesses, nations and regions. This race fortechnological supremacy creates a complex ecology of choices that may lead tonegative consequences, in particular, when ethical and safety procedures areunderestimated or even ignored. As a consequence, different actors are urgingto consider both the normative and social impact of these technologicaladvancements. As there is no easy access to data describing this AI race,theoretical models are necessary to understand its dynamics, allowing for theidentification of when, how and which procedures need to be put in place tofavour outcomes beneficial for all. We show that, next to the risks of setbacksand being reprimanded for unsafe behaviour, the time-scale in which AIsupremacy can be achieved plays a crucial role. When this supremacy can beachieved in a short term, those who completely ignore the safety precautionsare bound to win the race but at a cost to society, apparently requiringregulatory actions. Our analysis reveals that blindly imposing regulations maynot have anticipated effect as only for specific conditions a dilemma arisesbetween what individually preferred and globally beneficial. Similarobservations can be made for the long-term development case. Yet different fromthe short term situation, certain conditions require the promotion ofrisk-taking as opposed to compliance to safety regulations in order to improvesocial welfare. These results remain robust when two or several actors areinvolved in the race and when collective rather than individual setbacks areproduced by risk-taking behaviour. When defining codes of conduct andregulatory policies for AI, a clear understanding about the time-scale of therace is required.